Tag Archives: jama

These oncology docs really have to think about communicating risk and the affective aspects of decision making: http://oncology.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2239094

Next I can read ref 1: http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/103/19/1436

A taxonomy of these public responses is apparent: relief (as predicted by the authors of the article) that they did nothing to give themselves cancer, skepticism about the author’s motives, doubt about the accuracy of the science, a belief that the science must be wrong because cancer cannot be random, and anguish about their cancer being deprived of meaning. The last 2 responses often appear together.

http://jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?doi=10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0786