In slow progress on my plan to to go through the examples from the OpenBUGS webpage and port them to PyMC, I offer you now Blockers, a random effects meta-analysis of clinical trials.
Monthly Archives: April 2012
Hello Dear Readers,
Can someone help me quickly get up to speed on the Elsevier boycott? I’ve had a read through thecostofknowledge.com and even skimmed through Tim Gower’s statement of purpose. What I’m missing is what are the demands of this boycott? I’m delighted to have an excuse to refuse a request for refereeing, but how can my boycott be genuine about this if Elsevier has no way to make things right?
I was looking for a quote that was the topic of my last post, and I found it in the resources list for this very interesting organization, The Public Science Project. They have a 14 minutes video about their work which I recommend:
I was trying to remember some quote by the exploratory data analysis master John Tukey yesterday, and I think this is it:
No catalog of techniques can convey a willingness to look for what can be seen, whether or not anticipated. Yet this is at the heart of exploratory data analysis. The graph paper—and transparencies—are there, not as a technique, but rather as a recognition that the picture-examining eye is the best finder we have of the wholly unanticipated.
It is from John W. Tukey, We Need Both Exploratory and Confirmatory, The American Statistician, Vol. 34, No. 1 (Feb., 1980), pp. 23-25.
I remembered a version about the visual cortex as a the most advance signal processing device, so maybe there is another version of this out there.