Monthly Archives: February 2015

Tables of Stacked Bars in mpl (but not mpld3)

Here is a little feature in Matplotlib that I never saw before: stacked bar plots with tables attached. Perhaps too ugly for my Iraq Mortality stacked bar charts, but definitely handy for exploratory work.

I learned about it because it doesn’t work in `mpld3`… just one more benefit of being part of an open-source project. It would be so cool to have a `mpld3` version with some interactivity included, since interactivity can address one pitfalls of the stacked bar chart, the challenge of comparing lengths with different baselines.

Comments Off on Tables of Stacked Bars in mpl (but not mpld3)

Filed under dataviz

ML in Python: Getting the Decision Tree out of sklearn

I helped my students understand the decision tree classifier in sklearn recently. Maybe they think I helped too much. But I think it was good for them. We did an interesting little exercise, too, writing a program that writes a program that represents a decision tree. Maybe it will be useful to someone else as well:

```def print_tree(t, root=0, depth=1):
if depth == 1:
print 'def predict(X_i):'
indent = '    '*depth
print indent + '# node %s: impurity = %.2f' % (str(root), t.impurity[root])
left_child = t.children_left[root]
right_child = t.children_right[root]

if left_child == sklearn.tree._tree.TREE_LEAF:
print indent + 'return %s # (node %d)' % (str(t.value[root]), root)
else:
print indent + 'if X_i[%d] < %.2f: # (node %d)' % (t.feature[root], t.threshold[root], root)
print_tree(t, root=left_child, depth=depth+1)

print indent + 'else:'
print_tree(t,root=right_child, depth=depth+1)
```

Did I do this for MILK a few years ago? I’m becoming an absent-minded professor ahead of my time.

Comments Off on ML in Python: Getting the Decision Tree out of sklearn

Filed under machine learning

Data Science Seminars

These seminars that eScience and company are putting on are great. I have to go to the IHME seminars scheduled at competing time once in a while, so someone else attend at tell me about this one: http://data.uw.edu/seminar/2015/mullainathan/

Comments Off on Data Science Seminars

Filed under Uncategorized

Stephen Few on Missing Values

A new edition of the Visual Business Intelligence Newsletter crossed my inbox recently, on how to display timeseries with missing and incomplete values: http://www.perceptualedge.com/articles/visual_business_intelligence/missing_values_and_incomplete_periods_in_time_series.pdf

Good, simple ideas are our most precious intellectual commodity.

Comments Off on Stephen Few on Missing Values

Filed under Uncategorized

That Docker thing sounds promising

I missed this presentation, but I am going to figure out how to use Docker for reproducible research soon! http://benmarwick.github.io/UW-eScience-docker-for-reproducible-research/#1

Filed under software engineering

How many 3-digit zip codes are there?

There are 929 3-digit ZIP Codes in the country (USA).

http://www.carrierroutes.com/ZIPCodes.html

Comments Off on How many 3-digit zip codes are there?

Filed under global health

ML in Python: Decision Trees with Pandas

Doctors love decision trees, computer scientists love recursion, so maybe that’s why decision trees have been coming up so much in the Artificial Intelligence for Health Metricians class I’m teaching this quarter. We’ve been very sklearn-focused in our labs so far, but I thought my students might like to see how to build their own decision tree learner from scratch. So I put together this little notebook for them. Unfortunately, it is a little too complicated to make them do it themselves in a quarter-long class with no prerequisites on programming.

Filed under machine learning

DBER

In a recent post, I confessed my interest in a recent National Academy Press report on teaching methods. The tough thing for me about using this discipline-based education research (DBER) approach is not the name or the acronym, but coming up with the misunderstood concepts from the discipline that students benefit from learning actively. In the report examples, it seems like they are articulated by geniuses dedicated to teaching after years of student observation. I don’t know if I’ll get there one day, but I’m certainly not there now.

But I had a great idea, or at least one that I think is great: see what people are confused by online. I tried this out for my lecture last week on cross-validation, using the stats.stackexchange site: http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/cross-validation?sort=votes&pageSize=50

After reading a ton of these, I decided that if my students know when they need test/train/validation splits and when they can get aways with test/train splits then they’ve really figured things out. Now I can’t find the question that I thought distilled this best, though.